From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Mar  5 22:03:23 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id WAA14018
          for ports-outgoing; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 22:03:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA14011
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 22:03:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.7.4/8.6.9) id WAA13823; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 22:03:08 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 22:03:08 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199603060603.WAA13823@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com
CC: ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <374.826088274@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Subject: Re: Dependencies in the INDEX?  Whine..
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

 * You'll remember we talked about nuking the useless keyword field and
 * replacing it with a list of deps.

Ok, let me look at it.  You want the list of package names that
requires to run a port, right?

Satoshi