From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Aug 2 16:33:41 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from dt011n65.san.rr.com (dt011n65.san.rr.com [204.210.13.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F64150B0 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 16:33:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by dt011n65.san.rr.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA04940; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 16:32:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 16:32:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug X-Sender: doug@dt011n65.san.rr.com To: Thomas Mullaney Cc: Charles Randall , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: ssh/ssh2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 2 Aug 1999, Thomas Mullaney wrote: > If I were to use it in a commercial enviroment I would purchase a license. > What dubious design features does it have? You can search the archives for this list and bugtraq to get a better idea. Put another way, ssh version 1 is well tested and free, whereas version 2 is less well tested, new, costs money to use, and has no features that version 1 doesn't have. So, why use version 2? Doug -- On account of being a democracy and run by the people, we are the only nation in the world that has to keep a government four years, no matter what it does. -- Will Rogers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message