From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Dec 4 12:40:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from pgh.nepinc.com (pgh.nepinc.com [192.204.162.27]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D02D937B405 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 12:40:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from there (jimslaptop.int [192.100.100.66]) by pgh.nepinc.com (8.11.4/8.11.3) with SMTP id fB4Keb514245; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 15:40:37 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jimd@nepinc.com) Message-Id: <200112042040.fB4Keb514245@pgh.nepinc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Jim Durham Reply-To: jimd@nepinc.com To: Jordan Hubbard , Jim Durham Subject: Re: Can TCP changes be put in RELENG_4? Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 15:40:36 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3] Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG References: <21984.1007486225@winston.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <21984.1007486225@winston.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tuesday 04 December 2001 12:17 pm, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > > I know that only security fixes are supposed to go in RELENG_4, > > but > > You mean RELENG_4_4 I assume. RELENG_4 gets a lot more than just > security fixes. > > - Jordan Duh... right. OGS..(Old Guy Syndrome). I actually just did a cvsup to RELENG_4_4 and it didn't have the fixes. I guess I'll rephrase my question... "Can we have the patches in REGENG_4_4?". I put them in by hand and they looked like they were OK, but I haven't compiled a kernel yet. -Jim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message