From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 22 17:32:18 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 331FFD43 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:32:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from natasha.panasas.com (natasha.panasas.com [209.166.131.148]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D43752F87 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:32:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seabiscuit.panasas.com (seabiscuit.panasas.com [172.17.132.204]) by natasha.panasas.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id s6MHFnRn020919 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:15:50 -0400 Received: from SEABISCUIT.int.panasas.com ([172.17.132.204]) by seabiscuit ([172.17.132.204]) with mapi id 14.03.0181.006; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:15:49 -0700 From: "Pokala, Ravi" To: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Remote kernel debugging question Thread-Topic: Remote kernel debugging question Thread-Index: AQHPpdCVfurLj9uZVUaY1ceLGE0WUA== Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:15:49 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.3.140616 x-originating-ip: [172.17.28.63] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:32:18 -0000 > hint.uart.0.flags=3D"0x90" Is this an i386 or amd64 system? If so, shouldn't it be sio(4) rather than uart(4)? I thought uart(4) only became the default serial port driver for i386/amd64 as part of 10. -Ravi