From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb  8 13:14:50 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F08916A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  8 Feb 2005 13:14:50 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from relay.rdsnet.ro (gimli.rdsnet.ro [193.231.236.70])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 16FA343D31
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  8 Feb 2005 13:14:49 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com)
Received: (qmail 30564 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2005 13:10:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.rdsnet.ro) (62.231.74.130)
  by smtp1-133.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 8 Feb 2005 13:10:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 29283 invoked by uid 89); 8 Feb 2005 13:17:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98)
  by 0 with SMTP; 8 Feb 2005 13:17:56 -0000
Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1])
	by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195111140D;
	Tue,  8 Feb 2005 15:14:45 +0200 (EET)
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:14:44 +0200
From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com>
To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
Message-ID: <20050208151444.1e2f2045@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
In-Reply-To: <200502081400.07233.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
References: <Pine.BSO.4.56.0502081306440.28295@ux11.ltcm.net>
	<200502081333.08964.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
	<20050208144343.5bd6dd76@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
	<200502081400.07233.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: Mipam <mipam@ibb.net>
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ULE status
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 13:14:50 -0000

On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:00:03 +0100
Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> wrote:

> On Tuesday, 8. February 2005 13:43, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > There used to be a panic when
> > using rtprio to raise the priority of a running process, do you know if
> > it's fix ?
> 
> I never got any panics with ULE back when it was available, so I can't tell.

This was absolutely reproducible there is / was a PR on it.

> If you care about ULE, turn it on and see for yourself - more testers make 
> better testing.

I will do it it the weekend.

Thanks.

-- 
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"