Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:34:47 +0800 From: Kathy Quinlan <kat-free@kaqelectronics.dyndns.org> To: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc question Message-ID: <421E9CD7.5060503@kaqelectronics.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <200502251230.59147.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <421D584A.90203@kaqelectronics.dyndns.org> <200502241532.50010.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <421D81E9.809@kaqelectronics.dyndns.org> <200502251230.59147.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:57, Kathy Quinlan wrote: > >>ATM it is written in codevisionAVR which is where the function is >>called, so I guess for now I will just break the AVR support;) > > > Ahh.. > So.. are you talking about getting the coding running _in FreeBSD_ or compiled > on FreeBSD and running on an AVR? > I am talking about getting the same code running under FreeBSD AND the AVR with minimal changes. Regards, Kat. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 22/02/2005
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?421E9CD7.5060503>