Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Oct 2005 03:16:45 +0200
From:      Roger Skjetlein <rskjetlein@atmel.com>
To:        JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br>
Cc:        freebsd-smp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Poor network performance in 5.4 AMD64 Snap 8 with SMP support
Message-ID:  <4352FB7D.6030008@atmel.com>
In-Reply-To: <200510162045.33266.joao@matik.com.br>
References:  <20051008011047.T58661@netrunner.nu>	<20051016215759.S66014@fledge.watson.org>	<4352CC74.5060801@atmel.com> <200510162045.33266.joao@matik.com.br>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm a bit conserned since the 5.x didn't exactly prove good stabillity 
and performance records, thats why I ask wether 6.0 is better than 5.x.


JoaoBR wrote:
> On Sunday 16 October 2005 18:56, Roger Skjetlein wrote:
> 
>>I did try it, same problem occured. It disappered when I disabled
>>hyperthreading in bios.
>>
>>6.0- beta 5 and rc1 works fine with all features enabled.
>>
> 
> 
>  so when this resolves your problem ...
> 
> JM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
> Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik  https://datacenter.matik.com.br
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-smp@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-smp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4352FB7D.6030008>