From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jan 28 09:25:23 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA00509 for current-outgoing; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 09:25:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from silverback.gorilla.net (silverback.gorilla.net [208.128.8.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA00501 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 09:25:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@gorilla.net) Received: from ygordial011.gorilla.net (ygordial011.gorilla.net [208.143.84.11]) by silverback.gorilla.net (NTMail 3.03.0014/18.aaac) with ESMTP id ba048439 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 11:23:55 -0600 Received: (from tom@localhost) by gorilla.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA00353; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 11:24:52 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom) Message-ID: <19980128112452.34694@TOJ.org> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 11:24:52 -0600 From: Tom Jackson To: FreeBSD Current Subject: Help, is ed0 broken? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88e Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Would anyone know why a kernel with ed0 config'd will not compile. This is the first time I've tried it and apparently if_ed.c refrences '_ether_input' and friends and does not make the connection. In my source they're in net/if_var.h. Help, please. Tom