From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Nov 15 17:19:00 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE421103B9D for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 17:19:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (ns.dreamchaser.org [66.109.141.57]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 815F675336 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 17:18:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway [192.168.151.122]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id wAFHIpEa074325 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 10:18:52 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org From: Gary Aitken Subject: ports: 11.2 install incompatible with portsnap? To: freeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <0b12bf4c-8a2a-9642-7e72-600b6798543d@dreamchaser.org> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 10:18:14 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [192.168.151.101]); Thu, 15 Nov 2018 10:18:52 -0700 (MST) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 815F675336 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.40 / 200.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd@dreamchaser.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[dreamchaser.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.34)[0.344,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.96)[-0.956,0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[nightmare.dreamchaser.org]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.34)[0.344,0]; IP_SCORE(-0.02)[country: US(-0.10)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:21947, ipnet:66.109.128.0/19, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-Rspamd-Server: mx1.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 17:19:00 -0000 Haven't seen this on previous releases: Installed 11.2 release with ports. Built a large number of ports, then one failed. Went to update ports tree and it complained: Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. Fetching public key from your-org.portsnap.freebsd.org... done. Fetching snapshot tag from your-org.portsnap.freebsd.org... done. Fetching snapshot metadata... done. Fetching snapshot generated at Wed Nov 14 17:08:26 MST 2018: 55e6e00532155c422c0ee46824a8765642480a924fcc8e100% of 86 MB 368 kBps 03m59s Extracting snapshot... done. Verifying snapshot integrity... done. Fetching snapshot tag from your-org.portsnap.freebsd.org... done. Fetching snapshot metadata... done. Updating from Wed Nov 14 17:08:26 MST 2018 to Thu Nov 15 07:19:59 MST 2018. Fetching 5 metadata patches... done. Applying metadata patches... done. Fetching 0 metadata files... done. Fetching 38 patches. (38/38) 100.00% done. done. Applying patches... done. Fetching 2 new ports or files... done. root@breakaway:/usr/ports # portsnap update /usr/ports was not created by portsnap. You must run 'portsnap extract' before running 'portsnap update'. Note the next-to-last line: /usr/ports was not created by portsnap. That may be true. It was created during a sysinstall, but I don't know what the mechanism used to create it was. Is this now normal? Thanks for any insights, Gary