From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Sat Nov 26 07:56:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 347B5C56FB9; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 07:56:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15B006A6; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 07:56:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from anthias (vie-188-118-240-138.dsl.sil.at [188.118.240.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C95DD3F531; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 02:56:39 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 08:56:38 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Mark Linimon cc: Cy Schubert , koobs@FreeBSD.org, Cy Schubert , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r427017 - head/net/ntp In-Reply-To: <20161124153639.GA24019@lonesome.com> Message-ID: References: <201611241516.uAOFGFpJ073687@slippy.cwsent.com> <20161124153639.GA24019@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 07:56:42 -0000 On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, Mark Linimon wrote: >> I'll take a look at it further when I get home. I have a hunch that >> USE_GCC=4.8 or 4.9 will likely fix it. > fwiw, as of a few days ago, "USE_GCC=yes" is equivalent to "USE_GCC=4.9". Actually, USE_GCC=4.9+ (i.e., GCC 4.9 or later). And indeed, the use of version numbers should be minimized (so "yes" is better than "4.9+"). And the "or later" variant is preferred over requiring an exact version (so "4.9+" is better than "4.9"). USE_GCC=yes > USE_GCC=4.9+ > USE_GCC=4.9, where ">" is "preferred". Gerald