From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Dec 19 13:41:48 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA08401
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 13:41:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from westhill.cdrom.com (westhill.cdrom.com [192.216.223.138])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA08395
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 13:41:43 -0800 (PST)
From: gpalmer@westhill.cdrom.com
Received: from localhost.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1])
          by westhill.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id NAA05757
          ; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 13:41:36 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: westhill.cdrom.com: Host localhost.cdrom.com didn't use HELO protocol
To: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth)
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Ports Tree Empty :-( 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 19 Dec 1995 14:41:41 CST."
             <v02130500acfcd354fe60@[199.183.109.242]> 
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1995 13:41:34 -0800
Message-ID: <5755.819409294@westhill.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

Richard Wackerbarth wrote in message ID
<v02130500acfcd354fe60@[199.183.109.242]>:
> I just extracted the RELENG_2_1_0 branch from the -cvs tree.
> The ports tree comes up totally empty.
> I do not think that this is appropriate.
> The (-stable) branch which this represents SHOULD have a full tree of
> ports, even if they are not as up-to-date as the (-current) branch.

Err? The ports tree has NEVER been branched ONCE 'cos it would be a
TOTAL nightmare to administrate if we did... hence extracting with
RELENG_2_1_0 will get you an empty tree!

Gary