From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 2 12:29:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE3416A4CE for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 12:29:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from tenebras.com (laptop.tenebras.com [66.92.188.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9FDA43F93 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 12:29:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: (qmail 87455 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2003 20:29:06 -0000 Received: from sapphire.tenebras.com (HELO tenebras.com) (192.168.188.241) by laptop.tenebras.com with SMTP; 2 Dec 2003 20:29:06 -0000 Message-ID: <3FCCF60D.4020703@tenebras.com> Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 12:29:01 -0800 From: Michael Sierchio User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, zh-tw, zh-cn, fr, en, de-de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tyler Andersen References: <3FCC1FC8.3040407@tenebras.com> <1070350602.4578.223.camel@tyler.andersens.org> <3FCCE0B3.7050008@tenebras.com> In-Reply-To: <3FCCE0B3.7050008@tenebras.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Mailing List FreeBSD Network cc: imp@freebsd.org cc: soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com Subject: Re: Problems with Demarc Prism Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 20:29:10 -0000 Michael Sierchio wrote: > > [copied to soekris-tech because I know some of you are > using these cards] > > Which firmware rev are you running on the Demarc card? > mine reports > > wi0: Intersil Firmware: Primary 1.01.01, Station 1.07.04 > > which I guess is sorely out of date, SOP for shipped > product? > > The choices seem to range: 1.36, 1.49, 1.56, 1.74 The FreeBSD Handbook wireless section sez that Prism 2.5 cards should use firmware rev. 1.4.9. Is this still correct? Is 1.4.9 "better" than 1.5.6 or 1.7.4?