From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Fri Jan 19 17:17:54 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86D94EBD9FE; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 17:17:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6817C6A718; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 17:17:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id B540D10E0D; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 17:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 17:17:53 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Tijl Coosemans Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r459019 - in head/benchmarks: . lzbench Message-ID: <20180119171753.GA90466@FreeBSD.org> References: <201801150705.w0F75r9C001017@repo.freebsd.org> <20180115111845.0b7ec2f7@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180115111845.0b7ec2f7@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 17:17:54 -0000 On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:18:45AM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 07:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > Because GitHub releases (tarballs) are not fetched with correct > > modification time, set TIMESTAMP to 1515146810 which corresponds to > > commit 6c4ad37 tagged as this release. > > I've seen you say this a couple of times now and I don't think it really > matters. If I remember correctly TIMESTAMP isn't really related to > distfiles. It has something to do with reproducible builds. All files > generated during build are supposed to get this timestamp or something, > so the same port built on different machines at different times results > in exactly the same package. Tijl (sorry for delayed reply), Yeah, I know about the idea behind the TIMESTAMP thingy. I not saying that having some kind of timestamp attached to a port is bad or unneeded thing, or that reproducible builds are useless, etc. I'm just not very happy with current implementation. I've tried to make my point before: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/2016-May/124839.html https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/2016-June/125564.html ./danfe