Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:39:19 +0930 (CST)
From:      "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
To:        Chris BeHanna <behanna@zbzoom.net>
Cc:        FreeBSD-Stable <stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Why is the STABLE branch not so stable anymore?
Message-ID:  <XFMail.20010612123919.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.32.0106112306170.32911-100000@topperwein.dyndns.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 12-Jun-2001 Chris BeHanna wrote:
> > Except that only works if a) you grab the sources around UTC midnight,
>      You can tell cvsup to use a particular timestamp, no?
>  
>      (e.g., 2001.06.11.23.59.59)

Good point.. In which case 1 hour is probably way too long..

15 minutes would be fine.

---
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20010612123919.doconnor>