Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 08:47:55 +0930 (CST) From: "Daniel J. O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: "Mark J. Taylor" <mtaylor@cybernet.com> Cc: Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS Tensor Perth <shocking@prth.pgs.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Decent network cards for 100Mbit? Message-ID: <XFMail.990504084755.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.990503123027.mtaylor@cybernet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03-May-99 Mark J. Taylor wrote: > The Tulip-based cards are flatulent sacks of pus as well. > There are multicast problem with them. I'm sure Bill Paul can give us a > few words about these cards... Hmm, well I never use multicast so it doesn't really bother me. > Ever try to do multicast under Windows/NT with a Tulip-based card? It does > not work, even with the latest NT and DEC drivers. NT? Why would I do that? :) --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.990504084755.doconnor>