From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb 12 15:50:30 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C47116A402
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:50:30 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org)
Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net
	[69.17.117.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DE513C4B4
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:50:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org)
Received: (qmail 1056 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2007 15:50:29 -0000
Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org)
	([66.92.78.145])
	(envelope-sender <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>)
	by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; 12 Feb 2007 15:50:29 -0000
Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147)
	id 8C98B2842D; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:50:28 -0500 (EST)
To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>
References: <200702121532.l1CFWTE2054040@cwsys.cwsent.com>
From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:50:28 -0500
In-Reply-To: <200702121532.l1CFWTE2054040@cwsys.cwsent.com> (Cy Schubert's
	message of "Mon\, 12 Feb 2007 07\:32\:29 -0800")
Message-ID: <44bqjziddn.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.93 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Tuning Question
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:50:30 -0000

Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> writes:

> Top's output, as is free memory on all O/S's these days, is bogus. It's the 
> size of the free memory pool which is available for immediate allocation. 
> Used memory is just as  useless. It doesn't matter how much is swapped out, 
> what matters is how much I/O is being performed to support VM. I know at 
> work, which is an Oracle ghetto, paging should be kept at a minimum, 
> especially the SGA. Other apps can afford more. In the case of an average 
> FreeBSD system it's been guesswork.

What I thought you should use top for is tracking the swapping
rates.  But that's not enough, because the acceptable rates will
depend on what else is happening in the system.  If the CPU is maxed
out anyway (for example), then reducing the swapping will not
improve your performance.

My general approach to optimization is to identify a problem first.
If you can't pin down a performance problem that you want to solve,
then you aren't going to be able to prove that any changes fix that
problem anyway.