From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jul 31 03:03:27 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id DAA24541 for current-outgoing; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 03:03:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA24536 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 03:03:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.6/8.6.9) id DAA13501; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 03:03:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 03:03:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199707311003.DAA13501@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com CC: chuckr@glue.umd.edu, freebsd-current@freefall.FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: <19990.870331913@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@time.cdrom.com) Subject: Re: core group topics From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * I think it's hung up on the question of what to do with LDDESTDIR - * all agree that it's broken as currently used now but no one wants to * bell the cat, either. :-) The LDDESTDIR problem was solved a long time ago, at least as far as my patches are concerned. Whether we go in and remove all the other LDDESTDIRs in the tree or not, is an entirely different topic. Satoshi