From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 19 21:34:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D8A16A41F for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 21:34:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C10C43D46 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 21:34:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-a060.otenet.gr [212.205.215.60]) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j6JLYHPa014350; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 00:34:23 +0300 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6JLY93h001713; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 00:34:09 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j6JLXvAN001712; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 00:33:57 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 00:33:56 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Joachim Str?mbergson Message-ID: <20050719213356.GA1614@gothmog.gr> References: <42DCC503.5000408@ludd.ltu.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42DCC503.5000408@ludd.ltu.se> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 13:12:57 +0000 Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adding OpenBSD sudo to the FreeBSD base system? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 21:34:30 -0000 On 2005-07-19 11:16, Joachim Str?mbergson wrote: > Aloha! > > (I've Googled around a bit, but failed to find much previous posts about > this though I'm sure it has been discussed...) > > Have anybody (in core etc) considered adding a sudo implementation to > thr FreeBSD base system. At least for me, sudo is an important part of > implementing good security policy in FreeBSD. > > Yes, it is available as a port, but in a similar fashion of for example, > isn't sudo important enough to be included as an imported tool in the > base system? > > My thought was to sync/import the sudo implementation from OpenBSD. Bad > idea? Maybe not so bad if the OpenBSD version of sudo has useful enhancements of any sort (i.e. has gone through a thorough security audit, or it includes features that are not available through the Ports version, or if the OpenBSD sudo uses a BSD and not an ISC-style license). - Giorgos