Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 21:18:25 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, imp@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Theo de Raadt <deraadt@cvs.openbsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD BSD License 3 -> 2 Clause History Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1412302117530.81261@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <CAD2Ti2-t8YXcxGj6PM9wuy_zbmBf4A8Rrj4B7cofRrhhUFmAcw@mail.gmail.com> References: <54a1ec2a.853c460a.1d8a.2b34SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> <CAD2Ti2-=cUmABeDMFpuSvHp_h0PUXZTF6J-2TdiKi%2BnsRfskUA@mail.gmail.com> <57150.1419930741@critter.freebsd.dk> <CAD2Ti2-t8YXcxGj6PM9wuy_zbmBf4A8Rrj4B7cofRrhhUFmAcw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 30 Dec 2014, grarpamp wrote: > On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 4:12 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: >> I think you are reading more into that commit than it contains: >> It merely asserted "Copyright of Compilation" over FreeBSD. > > Likely. My original post wasn't worded well. I was mostly interested > in the rationale of removing the endorsement clause (from a license > writers perspective of new work, not any particular application of same), > which though 'simpler and more free', would seem a tricky thing to give > up, or to model new work on after having seen 3-clause texts. > > Though, to be sure, the rest of this thread is good to recount as well. > > For new, unfunded, work by individual committers, where is the link > to FreeBSD equivalent of this OpenBSD template? It seems attractive. > http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/share/misc/license.template?rev=HEAD The Committer's Guide has a suggested license: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/committers-guide/article.html#pref-license
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.11.1412302117530.81261>