From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Tue Nov 22 02:05:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80AFFC4ED44 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 02:05:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FAE119EA for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 02:05:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from yv.noip.me (c-24-6-186-56.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.186.56]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id uAM25EHN051328 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Nov 2016 18:05:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-24-6-186-56.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.186.56] claimed to be yv.noip.me Subject: Re: wpa_supplicant + wpa_gui have troubles when many APs have the same name To: Adrian Chadd References: <264bf419-c97f-a333-167a-5eb13a6bf96a@rawbw.com> <1983541127.1707358.1479779586520@mail.yahoo.com> <3b76a34b-0ac7-dd2e-60f0-e6b0ac811e44@rawbw.com> Cc: Fehmi Noyan ISI , freebsd-wireless From: Yuri Message-ID: <7e39e6b6-30a6-9c67-534b-4b8a1b2309e7@rawbw.com> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 18:05:13 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 02:05:15 -0000 On 11/21/2016 18:01, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi, > > Is it trying to send out probe requests to ALL of those devices for some reason? > > How many APs is too many? Maybe I can try duplicating it. I didn't debug it. But I observed that the problem occurred in several public places, like airports, conference halls, hotels which attempt to "cover" the space with APs with the same name. Sometimes there were 10-20 APs in sight. Yuri