From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Dec  4 12:37:30 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA27666
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 4 Dec 1997 12:37:30 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current)
Received: (from jmb@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA27595;
          Thu, 4 Dec 1997 12:37:14 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jmb)
From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb>
Message-Id: <199712042037.MAA27595@hub.freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: 3.0 -release ?
To: hasty@rah.star-gate.com (Amancio Hasty)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 1997 12:37:13 -0800 (PST)
Cc: nate@mt.sri.com, toasty@home.dragondata.com, jak@cetlink.net,
        current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199712040322.TAA02466@rah.star-gate.com> from "Amancio Hasty" at Dec 3, 97 07:22:46 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Amancio Hasty wrote:
> 
> > The people who run the 'OS of the day' aren't that critical to FreeBSD's
> > success, since there will *always* be something that causes them to
> > switch to another OS.
> 
> Lets assume that you are right, what is then critical to FreeBSD's success?

	stability
	performance
	predictibility

	my 2 cents
jmb