From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 7 19:25:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4D216A4DD for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 19:25:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14FC343D7F for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 19:25:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from [88.66.1.43] (helo=amd64.laiers.local) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu3) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKxQS-1GLPVB0cpQ-0005k9; Thu, 07 Sep 2006 21:25:32 +0200 From: Max Laier Organization: FreeBSD To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, KES Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 21:25:19 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <19710703252.20060907212112@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <19710703252.20060907212112@yandex.ru> X-Face: ,,8R(x[kmU]tKN@>gtH1yQE4aslGdu+2]; R]*pL,U>^H?)gW@49@wdJ`H<=?utf-8?q?=25=7D*=5FBD=0A=09U=5For=3D=5CmOZf764=26nYj=3DJYbR1PW0ud?=>|!~,,CPC.1-D$FG@0h3#'5"k{V]a~.<=?utf-8?q?mZ=7D44=23Se=7Em=0A=09Fe=7E=5C=5DX5B=5D=5Fxj?=(ykz9QKMw_l0C2AQ]}Ym8)fU MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2814107.morlUgbMXX"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200609072125.25957.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:61c499deaeeba3ba5be80f48ecc83056 Cc: Subject: Re: NEW IDEAS X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 19:25:36 -0000 --nextPart2814107.morlUgbMXX Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline [ Your caps-lock is broken ] On Thursday 07 September 2006 20:21, KES wrote: > Hello, freebsd-net. > > What about this? > > Archie Cobbs wrote: > >>KES wrote: > >> Hello, archie. > >> > >> How about 'ALTQ' node? or may be 'queue' node > >> for packets scheduling > >> > >> in--->|policy|--->out > >> > >> policy may be CBQ, PRIO, HFSC or HTB.... > >> > >> I want this: > >> > >> in-->HTB-->out - - - in-->PRIO-->out > > > >Sounds neat.. ask around on freebsd-net@freebsd.org as there may > >be others interested, etc. The problem is, how do you classify your traffic for queueing? i.e. where= =20 and how do you decide whether to put a given packet into queue A or B? In the normal processing path, this happens inside the packet filters=20 (either pf or ipfw at this time). On a given "firewall" rule you can=20 decide which queue will be used for packets that match the rule (or the=20 state created by this rule). This information is later used as the=20 packet is enqueued in the ALTQ on the network interface. If you want a=20 netgraph node (I belive that is what you are talking about) to do ALTQ,=20 you need a classifier somewhere as well. =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart2814107.morlUgbMXX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFAHIlXyyEoT62BG0RAmA4AJ9k3KsYg/nlzWddWxuTdX29mFQ06wCfQ0xQ eWU4Kd64nYI5dUskNP6leFY= =hDHc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2814107.morlUgbMXX--