From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 22 16:02:02 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA2116A4CE
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:02:02 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from aging.cpaaa.org (aging.cpaaa.org [165.201.71.250])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8776343D54
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:01:59 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from justin@cpaaa.org)
Received: from jboss-101440.sedgwick.gov ([172.19.19.7])
	by aging.cpaaa.org (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5MEnKQZ072610
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 09:49:27 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from justin@cpaaa.org)
From: "Justin L. Boss" <justin@cpaaa.org>
Organization: CPAAA
To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 09:49:30 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200406220949.30468.justin@cpaaa.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on aging.cpaaa.org
Subject: I'm not a porter but there are 2 ports I would hate to see go
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:02:02 -0000

linux-opengroupware-1.0_1:
I just think this will be a bad for FreeBSD, we need this one.

apache_fp-1.3.27_1:
I can't stand M$, and know that this is not to most secure of ports but a lot 
of people use Frontpage. Again bad for FreeBSD , we need this one too.