From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 25 15:52:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1DCF16A4CE; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:52:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7587E43D41; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:52:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 3D1955314; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:52:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 765BB5310; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:52:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 45733B85E; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:52:03 +0200 (CEST) To: Sam References: From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:52:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: (sah@softcardsystems.com's message of "Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:11:13 -0500 (EST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.64 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0 Witness squawk X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:52:11 -0000 Sam writes: > In general, is it ok to sleep with a mutex held? No, never. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no