From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 9 13:23:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 443E537B401 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 13:23:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Chow.corp.media.net (rottie.media.net [66.113.65.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A13A543F75 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 13:23:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from max.clark@media.net) Received: from MCLARK (76.0.6.10.IN-ADDR.ARPA [10.6.0.76]) by Chow.corp.media.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id HHRXS700.DD7; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 13:19:19 -0700 From: "Max Clark" To: "Dan Nelson" Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 13:27:51 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20030709202100.GN39506@dan.emsphone.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: RE: What ever happened with this? "eXperimental bandwidth delay product code" X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 20:23:27 -0000 :) hehe... Okay, let's say how do I force my machine to think it doesn't have any latency and saturate a 6Mbit/s link even though the link has 220ms latency? -----Original Message----- From: Dan Nelson [mailto:dnelson@allantgroup.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 1:21 PM To: Max Clark Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What ever happened with this? "eXperimental bandwidth delay product code" In the last episode (Jul 09), Max Clark said: > Assuming zero (0) network latency what should I configure on my > FreeBSD boxes to saturate a 6Mbit/s (750Kbyte/s) link? Assuming zero latency, absolutely nothing :) You can easily saturate a 100mbit LAN connection (which has like a 12K bw*d product) even with IDE disks. Latency and packetloss are the killers. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com