From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 00:24:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA101065672 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 00:24:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hskuhra@fastmail.fm) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE32A8FC20 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 00:24:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C71210EE for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 19:04:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 04 Mar 2012 19:04:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=GPuErdnx7rkynyUPNgPH+cB /4iE=; b=bDKbNbHjtHc7nezr+c8RpjDF49bTLH4zOtolok4rP4c5fVdxskDTnAk FAOjVXI2aqxyzs9xnweiZ098XSC+FO+rkrmudUNSEyP0WE9gIBVf+TkmTWUKDcwW 1UPIQ3iKA9x70EkxWE+MuLUnD5FN6wQK9MyENgTWeUVRbnUpwa6k= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=GPuErdnx7rkynyUPNgPH+cB/4iE=; b=g45R2WAG6FUe6SOTNAxCWnKooy6h Du0zofxNfeFDSRTYPXOIEsYq69lAwLquQA/6DwHtB9messB5hjOSseCcJI7mYrqU 7UFntB9Ekwacu5BwfP5qrIcMezq7rp3QXqIaD+aLyO8sT4GH8+hQK2Cl38A0eZFa bd5JbMye4773eZY= X-Sasl-enc: kE9z6/ZZ7fn06sJgtK79AFtQZq9Fn+hifGgj8byu6Is7 1330905890 Received: from oslo.ath.cx (unknown [188.118.228.74]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FC508E015C; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 19:04:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 01:04:47 +0100 Message-ID: <87vcmjap5s.wl%hskuhra@fastmail.fm> From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" To: Irjohn Junus In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 Emacs/24.0.94 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel(R) PRO/1000 PT Dual Port Server Adapter not working properly X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 00:24:08 -0000 On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 14:39:01 +0800 Irjohn Junus wrote: > Hello, > > This was originally posted here: > http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?p=168854&posted=1#post168854 > > I'm building a new PF firewall box based on FreeBSD 9 Release. Motherboard > is Foxconn H61S Mini-ITX with Intel PRO/1000 PT dual port server adapter. > > The adapter is recognized as em0 and em1 but em0 just won't work (i.e no > light on the port when connected to the switch) and em1 works only in > 100baseTX full-duplex mode (no carrier if I force it to 1000baseT). I tried > to change switch port, UTP cable from Cat5e to Cat6 but still no luck. The > onboard Realtek works fine. Switch is Netgear GS608. Could it be a bad > Intel card? > > I also tried to compile the latest driver from Intel but it gives error > during compilation: > http://downloadcenter.intel.com/conf...&Dwnldid=17509 > > Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks! > > ps: command captures are provided at the url above. Maybe you should test with 8.3-BETA1. The recent em1000 drivers (7.3.0?) were mfc'ed to stable/8 January 31st but not to stable/9. See: -- Herbert