From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jul 10 08:35:09 1995 Return-Path: bugs-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id IAA12837 for bugs-outgoing; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 08:35:09 -0700 Received: from space.physics.uiowa.edu (hobbes.physics.uiowa.edu [128.255.32.77]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id IAA12830 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 08:35:02 -0700 Received: from chip.physics.uiowa.edu by space.physics.uiowa.edu (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA25447; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 10:34:58 -0500 Received: by chip.physics.uiowa.edu (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA00652; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 10:34:56 -0500 Date: Mon, 10 Jul 1995 10:34:56 -0500 From: ljg@space.physics.uiowa.edu (Larry Granroth) Message-Id: <9507101534.AA00652@chip.physics.uiowa.edu> To: bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Won't install on network with 255 octet X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII Sender: bugs-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Greetings- The June 22 SNAP version still won't install on our network, which has a 255 octet (128.255.32.xxx). Jordan responded to my previous note (wrt 2.0.5R), saying that the network address error checking in the installation was over-zealous and would be corrected in the snap, but apparently the fixes didn't make it in. (The installation still complains about the validity of any address with a 255 in it.) I can't think of a way of building a new installation disk without FreeBSD running (or even with it running, for that matter). We have a new machine to replace a 16MHz 386SX as a router on one of our subnets, plus several faculty saying "Show me this great free UNIX", plus I'd like to replace NetBSD 1.0 on my own machine so I can use SCSI devices along with 32MB memory and an ISA bus . . . Help! larry-granroth@uiowa.edu