From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Apr  9 19:01:58 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA10906
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 9 Apr 1996 19:01:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spooky.rwwa.com (rwwa.com [198.115.177.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA10900
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 1996 19:01:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost.rwwa.com (localhost.rwwa.com [127.0.0.1]) by spooky.rwwa.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id WAA08148 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 1996 22:01:28 -0400
Message-Id: <199604100201.WAA08148@spooky.rwwa.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: spooky.rwwa.com: Host localhost.rwwa.com didn't use HELO protocol
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: GNU binutils port 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 08 Apr 1996 11:19:47 MDT."
             <199604081719.LAA26093@rover.village.org> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 1996 22:01:28 -0400
From: Robert Withrow <witr@rwwa.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I think that I must be missing something here...

Well, it might be my complaint that binutils *doesn't* build
out of the box...  ;-)

Any help there?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Withrow, Tel: +1 617 592 8935, Net: witr@rwwa.COM