From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr 11 14:38:33 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4076C106564A;
	Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:38:33 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com)
Received: from exhub015-2.exch015.msoutlookonline.net
	(exhub015-2.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.94])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A85C8FC12;
	Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:38:33 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com)
Received: from [192.168.2.170] (98.231.209.125) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net
	(207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.336.0;
	Sat, 11 Apr 2009 07:38:32 -0700
Message-ID: <49E0AB5D.60403@p6m7g8.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 10:38:21 -0400
From: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>
Organization: P6 Web Applications
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org>
References: <49DFC680.9000104@ridecharge.com>	<49DFCAEB.60505@p6m7g8.com>
	<20090411113216.24170d6f.stas@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090411113216.24170d6f.stas@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@ridecharge.com>, ruby@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: [RFC]: RUBYGEM_AUTOPLIST implied by USE_RUBYGEMS=yes
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions <freebsd-ruby.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ruby>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:38:33 -0000

> I don't think it is a good idead as historically we prefer static pkg-plists
> over dynamic ones. For ports where names of the files are perfectly known
> AUTOPLIST feature is not required. When I introduced this option my intention
> was to work around rdoc names generation problem and to not eliminate rubygem
> pkg-plists entirely.
*sigh*.

Wouldn't every rubygem port have to use it to work around that issue 
(the zfs one?)?

That means every rubygem should fail in QAT then b/c of the NOPORTDOCS
.... he must be excluding them.