Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 15:13:17 +0100 From: Peter Harmsen <pharmsen@horizon.nl> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsdb -uU fails Message-ID: <20050204151317.490b93b9@frantic.concepts.nl> In-Reply-To: <C3CADDE4-76A0-11D9-8017-000D93C7878E@illusionart.com> References: <mailman.0.1094200931.74570.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> <1DF8995C-7694-11D9-8017-000D93C7878E@illusionart.com> <200502040249.18006.kstewart@owt.com> <C3CADDE4-76A0-11D9-8017-000D93C7878E@illusionart.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:34:43 -0800 Vonleigh Simmons <nospam@illusionart.com> wrote: > > When this happens, the easy answer is to user "make fetchindex" and > > then > > only do a "portsdb -u". > > That worked fine. I'm confused though, am I not supposed to use the -U > flag at all? Because after running those two I tried -Uu again and I > got the same error. If I'm not supposed to use -U, has it been replaced > by something or is it not necessary? *********************************************************** Well i have ran into the same situation.I just added f for force and afterwards i updated everything that could be upgraded. So i most of the times use portsdb -Ufu and portupgrade -afrR or -arR serie/(meta-)app.This seems to work for me.Strange though because portsdb -Uu seemed to work for me until lately. Peter Harmsen ************************************************************ > Vonleigh Simmons > <http://illusionart.com/>; > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050204151317.490b93b9>