From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug 25 07:13:59 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57921106566B;
	Mon, 25 Aug 2008 07:13:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16BE88FC15;
	Mon, 25 Aug 2008 07:13:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m7P7Cg4n032913;
	Mon, 25 Aug 2008 01:12:42 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 01:13:12 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20080825.011312.-1956307484.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: arch@FreeBSD.org, ru@FreeBSD.org
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 
Subject: Code review: using ${.TARGET} instead of opt_*.h
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 07:13:59 -0000

I was cleaning out my tree, and noticed that I took a stab at solving
the problem opt_*.h being explicitly named in rules rather than
${.TARGET} when building modules.

Comments?

Warner