Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:59:48 +0100 From: Pawel Malachowski <pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl> To: Clement Laforet <sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Apache-related ports changes Message-ID: <20040114225948.GD72981@shellma.zin.lublin.pl> In-Reply-To: <20040114212351.2c0f28d6.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> References: <20040114212351.2c0f28d6.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 09:23:51PM +0100, Clement Laforet wrote: > 2. Checking if all apache13/apache2-apache21 layouts are in sync > We need to be sure that all apache ports follows to same layout to > provides an efficient way to deal with them. > When I use "layout", I means "files and directory localtion". > I'd also appreciate that apache13 ports have the same knobs. Some day I wanted to run both Apache 1.3.x and Apache 2.0.x, on the same host and environment (only different IP addressess, logs, etc.), not in jail, of course I shoot myself in the foot (that was before introducing CONFLICTS). Just asking: making Apache ports capable to coexist is not possible because of Apache nature also? -- Paweł Małachowski
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040114225948.GD72981>