From owner-freebsd-current Fri Feb 6 15:32:57 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA22125 for current-outgoing; Fri, 6 Feb 1998 15:32:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from allegro.lemis.com (allegro.lemis.com [192.109.197.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA22120 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 1998 15:32:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from freebie.lemis.com (freebie.lemis.com [192.109.197.137]) by allegro.lemis.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA09814; Sat, 7 Feb 1998 10:02:47 +1030 (CST) Received: (from grog@localhost) by freebie.lemis.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) id KAA27585; Sat, 7 Feb 1998 10:02:47 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from grog) Message-ID: <19980207100247.60298@freebie.lemis.com> Date: Sat, 7 Feb 1998 10:02:47 +1030 From: Greg Lehey To: Amancio Hasty Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, Julian Elischer Subject: Re: Remote gdb ? References: <19980206155859.02035@freebie.lemis.com> <199802061806.KAA10114@rah.star-gate.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89i In-Reply-To: <199802061806.KAA10114@rah.star-gate.com>; from Amancio Hasty on Fri, Feb 06, 1998 at 10:06:31AM -0800 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-41-739-7062 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe current" On Fri, 6 February 1998 at 10:06:31 -0800, Amancio Hasty wrote: >> On Thu, 5 February 1998 at 20:26:13 -0800, Amancio Hasty wrote: >>> >>> Does anyone know what can cause "Reply contains invalid hex digit 116" ? >> >> At a guess, it's an overrun. I haven't been able to get remote gdb to >> work reliably above 9600 bps. In fact, I haven't been able to get it >> to work reliably at all, but at least at 9600 bps I don't have any >> transmission errors :-) >> >> Of course, I don't believe it's a hex digit at all. I'd guess it's >> decimal (0x74 hex, or 't'). Is it repeatable? From what you show >> below, it appears to be intermittent. > > Nope, gdb remote is broken on -current. Where do you get that idea from? It has numerous problems, but it definitely works. I've been using it for the last several weeks. Greg