From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 5 00:00:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371C716A480 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 00:00:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA7F43D45 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 00:00:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4500biD001869 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 00:00:37 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k4500blB001868; Fri, 5 May 2006 00:00:37 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 00:00:37 GMT Message-Id: <200605050000.k4500blB001868@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Sam Lawrance Cc: Subject: Re: ports/95708: freebsd startup script for sec port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sam Lawrance List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 00:00:38 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/95708; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sam Lawrance To: Jo Rhett Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/95708: freebsd startup script for sec port Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 09:56:01 +1000 On 04/05/2006, at 8:10 PM, Jo Rhett wrote: > > From: Jo Rhett > To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org > Cc: > Subject: Re: ports/95708: freebsd startup script for sec port > Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 13:06:30 -0700 > > First of all, why didn't Nicholas respond to me instead of Edwin? It was Edwin's script that asked for the approval. By replying to that message, you get a copy and the bug report gets one for the record. > Second, the script does use rc macros. Is he looking at the same > bug? I think what the maintainer would like is a complete patch to also add USE_RC_SUBR to the makefile. The rc script should make use of use SUB_LIST expansions. For example, instead of hard coding /usr/local/bin/sec, you should use %% PREFIX%%/bin/sec. %%RC_SUBR%% is another important one to use. See the link that Ion-Mihai sent to you for more information about this.