Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 02:03:41 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: tlambert2@mindspring.com Cc: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@flugsvamp.com>, current@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fxp SCB timeout problems [FIX] Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20010828020210.032dc0b8@192.168.0.12> In-Reply-To: <3B8B3183.708F007C@mindspring.com> References: <20010826101102.A96709@prism.flugsvamp.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20010827102227.0574d240@marble.sentex.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 10:52 PM 8/27/2001 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
>Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > >fxp0: <Intel Pro/100 Ethernet> port 0xc400-0xc43f mem
> > >0xd5001000-0xd5001fff irq 11 at device 8.0 on pci1
> > >fxp0: *** DISABLING DYNAMIC STANDBY MODE IN EEPROM ***
> > >fxp0: New EEPROM ID: 0x49a0
> > >fxp0: EEPROM checksum @ 0xff: 0xe441 -> 0xe443
> > >fxp0: *** PLEASE REBOOT THE SYSTEM NOW FOR CORRECT OPERATION ***
>
> What's being lost
>here, when it is disabled, instead of being handled as the
>card manufacturer expects the OS to handle it?
From my perspective, negative functionality is being lost. There is a
nice comment in the source code explaining what it is...
* Enable workarounds for certain chip revision deficiencies.
*
* Systems based on the ICH2/ICH2-M chip from Intel have a defect
* where the chip can cause a PCI protocol violation if it receives
* a CU_RESUME command when it is entering the IDLE state. The
* workaround is to disable Dynamic Standby Mode, so the chip never
* deasserts CLKRUN#, and always remains in an active state.
*
* See Intel 82801BA/82801BAM Specification Update, Errata #30.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.1.0.14.0.20010828020210.032dc0b8>