From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 23 16:05:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B048316A403; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:05:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabriele@sssup.it) Received: from sssup.it (ms01.sssup.it [193.205.80.99]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B2A43D7D; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:03:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabriele@sssup.it) Received: from [193.205.82.27] (HELO [127.0.0.1]) by sssup.it (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP-TLS id 25179374; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 17:55:19 +0200 Message-ID: <453CE7CE.5000206@sssup.it> Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 18:03:26 +0200 From: Gabriele Cecchetti User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kazuaki ODA References: <17724.57427.231687.273549@canoe.dclg.ca> <453CE4E0.40301@highway.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <453CE4E0.40301@highway.ne.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, David Gilbert Subject: Re: ggate fails on 6.2-RC. X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:05:05 -0000 Kazuaki ODA ha scritto: > David Gilbert wrote: >> Has anyone else been testing ggate on amd64? There is an open pr that >> highlights a datatype problem between the kernel and userland, but >> even with that patch, I can't get ggate to stay up. I'll post in a >> more detailed manner about the problem as soon as I get my test-bed >> system up, but I'm looking for people who also have been testing this >> with 6.2-RC. >> >> Dave. >> > > I've posted in the problem about ggated to freebsd-stable@. Try to > backout sys/kern/uipc_socket2.c rev. 1.147.2.7. This has solved the > problem for me. > > During last days I've tried ggated too, but it did not work for me. I've tried to apply the patch proposed on pr, but it does not solved. I'll try this too. I think that this GEOM_gate need more attention, because it's a critical component when it is used. Gabriele