From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 2 15:05:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2599216A40F for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:05:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0377313C442 for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:05:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 2021 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2007 15:05:29 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 2 Jan 2007 15:05:29 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id A17732842F; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 10:05:28 -0500 (EST) To: Gerard Seibert References: <20061231080638.H24378@scorpio.seibercom.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 10:05:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20061231080638.H24378@scorpio.seibercom.net> (Gerard Seibert's message of "Sun, 31 Dec 2006 08:11:21 -0500 (EST)") Message-ID: <444pr91nbb.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: gnupg: discarding older version X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:05:30 -0000 Gerard Seibert writes: > Running: > /usr/sbin/pkg_version -vIL= > produces this output: > > gnupg-1.4.6_2 < needs updating (index has 2.0.1) > > > Running: > pkgdb -Fv > produces this output: > > Checking for origin duplicates > Duplicated origin: security/gnupg - gnupg-1.4.6_2 gnupg-2.0.1 > Unregister any of them? [no] > > This is from the /usr/ports/UPDATING file: > > 20061221: > AFFECTS: users of security/gnupg > AUTHOR: kuriyama@FreeBSD.org > > The security/gnupg port was upgraded to 2.0.1 (with security fix) > and good-old gnupg-1.4.6 was repocopied to security/gnupg1. > > Both of security/gnupg (2.x) and security/gnupg1 (1.4.x) are > designed not to conflict with each other. So you can use > security/gnupg1 for gpg(1), and use security/gnupg for gpg2(1) > commands. > > All directly dependents are $PORTREVISION bumped, so portupgrade -R > gnupg will works fine. After portupgrade, you will have both of > gnupg-2.0.1 and gnupg-1.4.6. > > Obviously, I now have both versions installed on my PC. My question is > should I simply answer (YES) and unregister the older version of this > program, or simply leave both versions installed. If I unregister the > older version, will it cause any problems? Not unless you wanted to use it.