From owner-freebsd-isp Tue May 29 8: 9: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from imo-r20.mx.aol.com (imo-r20.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94EB637B424 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 08:09:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Bsdguru@aol.com) Received: from Bsdguru@aol.com by imo-r20.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v30.10.) id 8.e4.15c15d4e (9819); Tue, 29 May 2001 11:08:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Bsdguru@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 11:08:26 EDT Subject: Re: Freeside To: jhs@jhs.muc.de Cc: isp@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 139 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In a message dated 05/29/2001 5:32:37 AM Eastern Daylight Time, jhs@jhs.muc.de writes: > > Are you somehow implying that in order to post to this I am obligated > to > > use FreeBSD as my mail client? > > If you _choose_ to avoid all BSD mail tools, that's rather suspect: > BSD people generally use BSD where they can, & only use M$-Inc > platform based stuff if constrained to no other choice. I think that your statement shows that you are incapable of making a rational decision, therefore diluting your opinion to the point of irrelevancy. Just because I CAN make is all work doesn't mean that I want to spend a lot of time getting BSD to do something that my windows box does naturally (the fact that I have to reboot it twice daily not withstanding). Anyone who thinks that 'BSD is a more powerful or useful desktop than windows isn't reasoning with a full deck. You can avoid cheeseburgers for religous reasons if you want, but don't criticize me because I enjoy them. Bryan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message