From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep  8 08:13:52 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679F516A4BF
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Mon,  8 Sep 2003 08:13:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linux.research.att.com (H-135-207-24-16.research.att.com
	[135.207.24.16])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D3943FF5
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Mon,  8 Sep 2003 08:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from fenner@research.att.com)
Received: from unixmail.research.att.com (unixmail.research.att.com
	[135.207.26.71])h88FKMvB002736;	Mon, 8 Sep 2003 11:20:22 -0400
Received: from windsor.research.att.com (windsor.research.att.com
	[135.207.26.46])h88FCcZn020749;	Mon, 8 Sep 2003 11:12:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Received: (from fenner@localhost)
	by windsor.research.att.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.8.5) id h88FDm927987;
	Mon, 8 Sep 2003 08:13:48 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200309081513.h88FDm927987@windsor.research.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
To: freebsd@yazzy.org
References: <200309071704.h87H42cD033400@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<3F5BC1C0.8030807@yazzy.org>
	<200309072352.h87Nqaf20365@windsor.research.att.com>
	<3F5BC9AD.7050906@yazzy.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 08:13:47 -0700
Versions: dmail (solaris) 2.5a/makemail 2.9d
cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Unfetchable distfiles reminder
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 15:13:52 -0000


>I just wonder if this list is correct at all now that one of the two 
>randomely chosen ports actually worked. And all I can see is red labeled 
>comments...

If you go to the detail page for the port in question, you will see
that it is labelled "skipped" and the result is in purple, and not
"bad" with the result in red.  The summary page takes a pessimistic
view since it can't know for sure that a port that is "skipped" is
ever fetchable.

  Bill