Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 06:53:41 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 is coming too fast Message-ID: <20050425135341.GA1965@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <426CF3DE.4000409@samsco.org> References: <3822.216.177.243.38.1114385370.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com> <20050425000459.GA28667@xor.obsecurity.org> <6.2.1.2.0.20050424204611.072105a0@64.7.153.2> <20050425010242.GA44110@xor.obsecurity.org> <6.2.1.2.0.20050424210422.03d22990@64.7.153.2> <20050425014453.GA59981@xor.obsecurity.org> <426C6B1D.3040704@elischer.org> <20050425061459.GA33247@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050425062106.GB91852@voodoo.oberon.net> <426CF3DE.4000409@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 07:42:54AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > > > >According to gcc-4.0 release notes, compilation speed for C++ was > >dramatically increased, up to 25% IIRC. I think 4.0 is good > >candidate for merging into HEAD. > > > > Is this work that you plan on doing for us? What about the deprecated > language constructs in 4.0? What about the lack of exposure that it's > had outside of the FSF and Apple development circles? > I build gcc-4.x almost daily on i386 and amd64 FreeBSD systems. I would recommend a conservative approach of not updating at this time. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050425135341.GA1965>