From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 19 12:33:26 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E1A537B401 for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 12:33:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6855043FBD for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 12:33:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.201]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6JJXPv1079237; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 12:33:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6JJXOL1017498; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 12:33:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6JJXOsZ017497; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 12:33:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 12:33:24 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Alexander Kabaev Message-ID: <20030719193324.GA17449@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <20030719045625.GB45759@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20030719095406.02c51beb.kabaev@mail.ru> <20030719162406.GA16766@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20030719151958.6cdeb7eb.kabaev@mail.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030719151958.6cdeb7eb.kabaev@mail.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some more on TLS X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 19:33:26 -0000 On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 03:19:58PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > Um, the July 7h snapshot of GCC 3.3.1 from ports does not generate > these %{Gl} prefixes. This might be something I missed during import or > it is possible that they did indeed modify compiler in the very recent > future. I'll tell you what it is later. Ok. Don't rule out a compiler bug. I cannot find any justification for the prefixes myself. > Stick with the ports compiler until then. No need. I have ia64 :-) > I talked to David and he agreed to import new binutils for us in about > two weeks from now. Top! -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net