From owner-freebsd-security Wed Apr 22 17:50:31 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA22307 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 17:50:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA22242; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 00:50:09 GMT (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA15843; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 17:48:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199804230048.RAA15843@implode.root.com> To: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG cc: benedict@echonyc.com (Snob Art Genre), freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Static vs. dynamic linking (was Re: Using MD5 insted of DES ...) In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 22 Apr 1998 18:01:46 CDT." <199804222301.SAA06796@dyson.iquest.net> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 17:48:35 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk >Programs where it is likely slightly advantageous to link shared: > cc1, cc1plus We found that compile times increased 10% when cc1 was compiled shared, so that would not be a good candidate. -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message