From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 7 00:10:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 048451B9 for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 00:10:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org (mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org [204.13.248.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45A9351 for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 00:10:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c-24-8-230-52.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.230.52] helo=damnhippie.dyndns.org) by mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UDOQD-000HKa-Oi; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:10:58 +0000 Received: from [172.22.42.240] (revolution.hippie.lan [172.22.42.240]) by damnhippie.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r270As7O003627; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 17:10:54 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ian@FreeBSD.org) X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 24.8.230.52 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX194A3rWm5F8khUpGKcu4VX5 Subject: Re: cross-compilation of sh(1) from x86 to arm From: Ian Lepore To: Jilles Tjoelker In-Reply-To: <20130306215607.GB15814@stack.nl> References: <20130303231931.GD21318@stack.nl> <1362582185.1291.106.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <20130306215607.GB15814@stack.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 17:10:54 -0700 Message-ID: <1362615054.1291.159.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:10:59 -0000 On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 22:56 +0100, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > Thanks, but I'm not planning to MFC anything more to stable/8/bin/sh > right now. (Unless you'd like to have some (compatible) change from 9.x > or 10.x.) > Did the vfork() changes ever make it to 8? That'd be nice to have if it's easy, don't worry about it if it's a lot of work. -- Ian