From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Jul 27 16:45:14 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA28500 for emulation-outgoing; Sun, 27 Jul 1997 16:45:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ingenieria ([168.176.15.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA28494 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 1997 16:45:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unalmodem.usc.unal.edu.co by ingenieria (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id TAA07625; Sun, 27 Jul 1997 19:31:33 -0400 Message-ID: <33DBF8B5.7CC5@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 1997 18:41:09 -0700 From: "Pedro Giffuni S," Organization: Universidad Nacional de Colombia X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold [it] (Win16; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dkelly@HiWAAY.net CC: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NetBSD i386 binaries? References: <199707272309.SAA00535@nexgen.hiwaay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk dkelly@HiWAAY.net wrote: >... > > All executable binaries emit that error message. So, what am I doing wrong? I tried NetBSD's daVinci and got bus errors. You might have noticed that FreeBSD 2.x doesn't support all the system calls in NetBSD. I assume you are using 2.x, I don't know how 3.0 goes. > Should I push for a native FreeBSD version? (they sounded willing) > Don't push, just ask :-). People that offer products for NetBSD are rational enough to offer FreeBSD binaries. Pedro. > > -- > David Kelly N4HHE dkelly@hiwaay.net > ====================================================================== > The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its > capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system.