From nobody Wed Feb 15 04:26:21 2023 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-all@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PGlQ63yKjz3rDc5; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 04:26:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PGlQ63Qwxz3KDN; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 04:26:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1676435182; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TjAwBIk9jrOePR98jgDk9S2xXrV7hktdhgGDWA3L0Ps=; b=XKBiBOfao/VZ0H44mpXNW1HX1Uw8vlzSzNpaec0avnfEBz0L29Dz7hYGl20OYnIZu6zwJX mNH9v9p437iyzcvjXl5DMYtUdG6XNYnsylOnXRuPRfOtRuLJfJIfki824fHSU8jijPZH8g w44Kfzqzc5pdIWSc/Mq6vdUMRS1/1C9D/p7ex4EghAy3K/5k01esQ4qchZJZ4VxITU92NN g28mex/ShL/JD5oH5Z4dM80wqrC0LZ6MbtjKDu5FSTMBbmc1K01WnmhMSH7Fqb+LSN/Tdd GknZ333MAtpLqsUEd8niwUmXBNqSj7t8QokGYg+voShXm1BKvwfb8Cw2zfcBUQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1676435182; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TjAwBIk9jrOePR98jgDk9S2xXrV7hktdhgGDWA3L0Ps=; b=sIWx5vRlo+gmcfny6GmF0KaH7zA8jvqvrkYBMptXxxDDM2yqN4scDnDsrT8vKNgnb91EyH XDT3ke31ZVneZbzHT3Nba61LJBhset2IhJEsQB2oKfGo+sIK4dzZ7NhwWBcgQhKKrzftMK Si+9+CWgly5aErCM7SR1p90vCjFzqw4jMNEXjEg3uLt5wBRmOS616pDrfVLmyHPj+lbrW7 iY/Ai9Og4jO98iG30kW26cJM0D/Qcpg8BahTeK0NE4m1R7ghslWb5LBmGbpFvtF0oXp0/L pQz+g1ZJFCbuc3IEtfBfhzOPT7OEvldNhwm9l2k4CqWzfw6ElEjuo53fw4Zkyw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1676435182; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=SAh9GoyMAh/nGj5C3vOZIQ6qScvF6vc8zBIDES+S3gUWNSlsnuq0uqzhkTB67fAweIii/z brxZ43feqLJBddHnqqVn5iXOZIQEaT+VmBm1DAvdR9g9BPgZL8DeMIad/yP9zgw5KivyYd pPRm0sjw6zlguvgJDPzoKw33WofuSHG8gIyifuxFsHslIowv67ZzVV50aO98I/2X5tZAKQ dWs1Nom2IkEXKtwxq2Wmx0zg4fZ5ON9Pf0JpBgJY7zHmhOWaErScOJHRLmyNgp5oRDv/nR jCMw4KnplwI8UGvCllsSZw5soU42Z0bi1x6YnCac9H5MbDR7c7OwUZHZYRoBsQ== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 026DE1EA9A; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 04:26:21 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 04:26:21 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Cy Schubert Cc: Jan Beich , Cy Schubert , ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 57a30ab234a9 - main - net/tcpview: Fix build with LLVM15 Message-ID: References: <202302111441.31BEf32w000463@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <20230212033839.6259B28E@slippy.cwsent.com> List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-all List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230212033839.6259B28E@slippy.cwsent.com> X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 07:38:39PM -0800, Cy Schubert wrote: > ... > The exact error, due to -Wint-conversion now being the default in LLVM15 -- > https://reviews.llvm.org/D129881. > > detail-domain.c:449:13: error: incompatible pointer to integer conversion returning 'void *' from a function with result type 'int' [-Wint-conversion] > return NULL; > ^~~~ So why not fix the broken code rather than suppress the useful warning? New strict Clang already revealed several real bugs in various ports, thus I encourage everyone not to silence the compiler, but examine and address the actual problem with the code. > Previously there would have been an exp-run prior to a new LLVM import > allowing for better planning and staging than the current react mode. There was an exp-run (PR 265425), but apparently dim@ concentrated on trying to fix relatively high-profile ports which unblock N [other] ports, so many affected leaf ports got under his radar. ./danfe