Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 12:00:21 -0500 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Built-in lpr vs CUPS Message-ID: <8765b4md3u.fsf@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <87r7tszcbl.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de> (Kai Grossjohann's message of "Mon, 10 May 2004 14:38:54 %2B0200") References: <871xlu3lk5.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de> <87n04iuzue.fsf@strauser.com> <409DA70E.5020708@users.sourceforge.net> <87r7tszcbl.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 2004-05-10T12:38:54Z, Kai Grossjohann <kai@emptydomain.de> writes: > This sounds like a good idea. I will do this now, so I just have to > remember to build CUPS again after the world. Not really. The "NO_LPR=3Dyes" flag tells the make system not to build or install any of the lpr files again, ever, until you unset it. Once you do this, CUPS will be your lpr for as long as you want. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser "94 outdated ports on the box, 94 outdated ports. Portupgrade one, an hour 'til done, 82 outdated ports on the box." --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAn7Us5sRg+Y0CpvERAtZDAJ4gIfkYAH2lKRM/YlIeI2MjZKpDJACgpEhp 3IMF5brMO+UtcLuADLL/tnQ= =3aFh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8765b4md3u.fsf>