From owner-freebsd-security Mon Apr 12 14:56:36 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from beatrice.rutgers.edu (beatrice.rutgers.edu [165.230.209.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1942614CF8 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 1999 14:56:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu) Received: (from easmith@localhost) by beatrice.rutgers.edu (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id QAA05528; Mon, 12 Apr 1999 16:56:26 -0400 (EDT) From: "Allen Smith" Message-Id: <9904121656.ZM5526@beatrice.rutgers.edu> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 16:56:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: Brett Glass "Re: ssh protocol [was: Interesting problem: chowning files sent via FTP]" (Apr 12, 4:30pm) References: <4.2.0.32.19990412152634.00ce0bb0@localhost> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.3 08feb96 MediaMail) To: Brett Glass , "Gregory P. Smith" Subject: Re: ssh protocol [was: Interesting problem: chowning files sent via FTP] Cc: Igor Roshchin , security@FreeBSD.ORG Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Apr 12, 4:30pm, Brett Glass (possibly) wrote: > A GPLed implementation would be a bad idea, because it would prevent > the code from being incorporated into commercial products and thus > discourage standardization. This is one situation in which BSD-type > licensing would be infinitely preferable. Actually, what would be preferable is some form of GNU _library_ license. I'm not willing to trust an encryption program unless I know independent cryptographers have reviewed the code. -Allen -- Allen Smith easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message