Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 13 Sep 1995 13:56:52 -0400
From:      "Garrett A. Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>
To:        Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Cc:        current@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Is nullfs broken in -current?
Message-ID:  <9509131756.AA02082@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <199509131752.KAA07769@phaeton.artisoft.com>
References:  <199509122200.AAA19788@keltia.Freenix.FR> <199509131752.KAA07769@phaeton.artisoft.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Wed, 13 Sep 1995 10:52:16 -0700 (MST), Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> said:

>> It seems that Garrett A. Wollman said:
>> > # mount -t null -o union /dsk2/src1 /usr/src
>> > # mount -t null -o union /dsk3/src2 /usr/src
>> > # cd /usr/src
>> > # make world

> This one is a unionfs, not a nullfs.

No, it is NOT a bloody unionfs!  `unionfs' == ``translucent
filesystem''.  This is a nullfs using the `union mount' mechanism.
BIG DIFFERENCE.

-GAWollman

--
Garrett A. Wollman   | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... 
wollman@lcs.mit.edu  | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance.
Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence.  We like people
MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish.  - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9509131756.AA02082>