From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jun 14 10:44:39 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA16045 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 10:44:39 -0700 Received: from temptation.interlog.com (temp@temptation.interlog.com [198.53.146.54]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA16029 ; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 10:44:32 -0700 Received: (from temp@localhost) by temptation.interlog.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id NAA27236; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 13:43:17 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 13:43:15 -0400 From: Temptation Subject: Re: LIST PING To: Terry Lambert cc: Poul-Henning Kamp , paul@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <9506141727.AA16651@cs.weber.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk I'm getting your messages :) > I have yet to recieve anything from hackers since 5 am this morning, > Eastern Standard Time. > > This includes all the people blindly responding to my "PING" causing > me to get current and questions traffic galore, their responses being > cross-posted to all three lists. > > The argument that "hackers is slow" is bogus (I think) because of the > bulk mailer stuff. > > Sean says that my area of the net was unreachable to him for half of > yesterday (though I didn't see any list interaction problems myself). > > Is anyone getting any of the stuff I sent as being mailed from > hackers-owner rather than from some other route? I mean, if we are > all going to talk about a "PING" message that was pretty much meant > to be ignored 8^) anyway. > > What is the failure threshold for a list kick? Maybe it auto-kicked me? > > > Terry Lambert > terry@cs.weber.edu > --- > Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present > or previous employers. >