From owner-freebsd-arch  Sat Jan 27 15:50:14 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from aslan.scsiguy.com (aslan.scsiguy.com [63.229.232.106])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC8A237B400
	for <freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 15:49:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scsiguy.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by aslan.scsiguy.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f0RNnrO31566;
	Sat, 27 Jan 2001 16:49:53 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com)
Message-Id: <200101272349.f0RNnrO31566@aslan.scsiguy.com>
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Proposed change to sbuf semantics 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "28 Jan 2001 00:06:37 +0100."
             <xzpwvbgppc2.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> 
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 16:49:53 -0700
From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>> In otherwords, I'd like to be able to test if an
>> sbuf has been written to before it has been finalized
>> so you can do things like:
>
>Well, you can use sbuf_len() for that. It returns 0 if the sbuf is
>empty, -1 if it overflowed, and the length of its contents otherwise.

I thought that sbuf_len() required a finalized buffer.  Did you change
this in your patches?

--
Justin


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message